Hello,
This post have some extra conversion. The first one just have some pages that I used until that moment. This one have the conversion table until now.
Matheus Bratfisch
First lectures.
Second lectures.
New lectures:
Lecture 20:
354-362Lecture 21:
362-371Lecture 22:
371-381Lecture V:
A33-A37Lecture 23:
381-383Lecture 27:
385-395Lecture 24:
428-430
439-443Lecture 25:
445-449Lecture 26:
449-452
457-459
Conversion table until the moment (including from the older post)
106-109, 112 -> 78-85
2-8 -> 2-7
12-14 -> 9-11
27-32 -> 21-25
48-68 -> 37-50
68-78 -> 50-57
79-85 -> 58->62
85-90 -> 62-66
90-105-> 66-78
106-108->78-80
116-129->85-96
134-143->99-106
160-175, 190 -> 120-128
76 -> 55-56
240-254 -> 182-193
254-266 -> 193-201
268-270 -> 203-204
108-114 -> 80-84
284-300 -> 214-225
300-318 -> 225-239
318-324 -> 239-244
325-340-> 244-256
340-350-> 257-264
382 -> 279
423-424->317-322
370-379->278-285
379-384->285-289
384-402->289-303
432-442->326-334
442-450->334-340
468-479->354-362
479-491->362-371
492-504->371-381
505-508->381-383
511-523->385-395
566-568->428-430
581-585->439-443
589-593->445-449
593-596->449-452
603-606->457-459
Worth saying that the writing carries a particular kind of authority without making any explicit claims to it, and a stop at ivorysave extended that earned authority feeling, sites that demonstrate expertise through the quality of their explanations rather than by stating credentials are sites I trust most and this site has it.
Honestly the simplicity is what makes this work, the topic is not buried under filler words or overly complex examples, and a quick look at prismwing showed the same sensible style, I left with what I came for and no headache from over reading which is a real win these days.
Now thinking about how to apply some of this to a project I have been planning, and a look at socksyndicate added more material for the planning, content that connects to my actual creative work rather than just being interesting in the abstract is the kind that earns priority placement in my reading rotation consistently going forward.
Once I had read three posts the editorial pattern was clear, and a look at vexflag confirmed the pattern from a fourth angle, sites where the underlying approach reveals itself through accumulated reading rather than being announced are sites with real depth and this one has that quality clearly visible across multiple pieces consistently.
Taking the time to read carefully here has been worthwhile for the past hour, and a look at zeroprobe extended the worthwhile reading, the calculation of return on reading time spent is something I do informally and this site has been producing positive returns across multiple sessions during the last week of regular visits and reads.
Took the time to read every paragraph rather than skimming for the punchline, and a quick visit to stretchstudio earned the same careful attention from me, that is the highest signal I can give about content quality because my default mode is rapid scanning rather than deliberate reading on most pages.
Picked this post to share in a Slack channel where I knew it would be appreciated, and a look at jadeperk suggested I will share more from here later, content worth sharing into a professional context is content that has earned a higher kind of trust than mere personal interest and this site has it.
Now noticing that the post avoided the temptation to be funny in places where humour would have undermined the substance, and a stop at protoflux maintained the same restraint, knowing when to be serious is a rare editorial virtue and this site has clearly developed it through what I assume is careful editorial practice over years.
Will be coming back to this for sure, too much good content to absorb in one sitting, and a stop at ohmcore only added more pages I want to dig through, this site is going onto my regular rotation list because it consistently delivers something worth the visit lately rather than empty filler.