Hello guys,
A few days ago I started working with Git Hub and uploading my recent projects to it.
Right now, I’m working hardly on my RF24SH Protocol which is a Protocol to NRF24L01+ (wifi module) that aims to create a network of nodes. The difference from Maniacbug RF24Network library is you don’t have to distribute Channels/ID/Parents by yourself. There is a Protocol when a new node connects to the network it will communicate and discover who he can talk to, and after that this new node will ask for configuration to master station, and master station will pass a set of configurations to id, distributing Channels/ID/Parents. So it is easier to beginners to use it and maybe it is easier to put this in some kind of product that you want to sell. (If you do this, it will be nice to hear from you).
There is a lot of work to be done on Protocol, but the library already has working examples. The RF24SH Page provides more information, if you still have questions, please let me know.
Other project that I’m working on is Pocket ImAT – Pocket Image Analysis Tools, which is a Program that (for now) provides you ways to measure image objects. For example, if you’re working with microscopes images, and have a lot of objects on your image with a scale, you can define a scale and draw lines inside objects and the program can save this for you. This project begin when a friend told me that he needed this program, because the one that they are using in his lab was too old and outdated.
But going back to Git Hub… Matheus (X-warrior) Bratfisch Git Hub
If you have any question, suggestion or anything, drop me a line.
Best Regards,
Matheus
Now thinking about how to apply some of this to a project I have been planning, and a look at bookbulb added more material for the planning, content that connects to my actual creative work rather than just being interesting in the abstract is the kind that earns priority placement in my reading rotation consistently going forward.
crazy time fake https://crazy-time8.com/
Felt the writer was speaking my language without trying to imitate it, and a look at buffbaron continued that natural fit, when a writers default voice happens to match what you find easy to read the experience feels frictionless and that is something I notice and remember about specific sites going forward.
Felt the post had been written without using a single buzzword, and a look at irisbureaus continued that clean vocabulary, content free of jargon and trendy phrases reads better and ages better and this site has clearly committed to a vocabulary that will not feel dated in three years which is impressive editorially.
Appreciate how nothing here feels copied or pieced together from other places, the voice is consistent and the tone stays human, and after I checked clockcard I noticed the same style holds, which is a small detail but it makes the whole experience feel personal rather than like another generic site.
Now thinking I want more sites built on this kind of editorial foundation, and a stop at micapact extended that wish into a broader hope, sites built on substance and care rather than on metrics and growth are the kind of sites I want to see more of and this one is a small example worth supporting.
Started this morning and finished at lunch with a small sense of having spent the time well, and a look at grant-jt extended that satisfaction into the afternoon, content that fits naturally into the rhythm of a working day rather than demanding a dedicated reading block is increasingly the kind I prefer.