Ir ao conteúdo

Atualizar VirtualBox para 3.0 no Ubuntu 9.04

Boa noite,

Como publiquei anteriormente, hoje fiz duas atualizações do VirtualBox. Inicialmente atualizei para a versão 2.2.4 e agora fui ver se tinha algum problema em atualizar para a versão 3.0. Diferente da outra atualização, ele não fazia a desinstalação do 2.2.4 automaticamente, quando iniciei o pacote, ele dizia que havia conflito entre as versões instaladas. Então manualmente remove o virutalbox 2.2.4 pelo synaptic e voltei a tentar a instalação pelo .deb. Fazendo dessa maneira obtive sucesso. Após a instalação foi necessário reiniciar o sistema. Lá apareceu ele o VirtualBox em System tools. Iniciei o mesmo e achei que precisaria cadastrar todas as máquinas novamente, porém para minha surpresa as opções foram mantidas, minhas máquinas virtuais continuaram lá intactas. Tentei iniciar uma e obtive sucesso.

Como não fiz uma instalação sem ter configurações no meu sistema não posso garantir que a “fresh” instalação funcionará porém como as opções são as mesmas pelo visto, você pode ler outros artigos sobre Como instalar o VirtualBox no Ubuntu, Como instalar o VirtualBox no Windows 7, Como atualizar o VirtualBox para instalar a sua versão 2.x ou 3.x, caso ainda tenha problemas você pode pesquisar aqui mesmo, sobre o virtualbox que existem outro tópicos sobre o mesmo ou ainda no Grande Oráculo. Mas me parece que ambas funcionam da mesma maneira com relação a opções de configurações então você provavelmente não terá problemas que não são solucionados por esse e pelos outros tópicos.

Download do VirtualBox

Att,
Matheus

Publicado emLinuxUbuntu

8.361 Comentários

  1. Reading this slowly because the writing rewards a slower pace, and a stop at trendingnewsfeed did the same, the pace at which I read content is something I now use as a quality signal and writing that earns a slower pace earns my attention as a reader looking for substance these days.

  2. OK — been using this thing for something like a few months now and I keep coming back, reckon I’d chuck my thoughts in since a lad on another thread asked me last week. I’m based in the UK, generally bet football and racing, nothing mad, for context.

    The reason I started using it was actually pretty stupid — I could never work out what an ew payout actually was when the place terms changed. I’d just wing it and moan when the payout landed. These days I type the odds in first, every time, even a simple single bet.

    Their single bet calculator is the one I’m on daily — you drop in your stake, the odds and you get profit and total return straight away, fractional or decimal, doesn’t matter. There’s also the fiddly ones — doubles and trebles maths, a lucky 15, a yankee, which is where I always got it wrong. Have a go yourself, it’s over at sports betting vig calculator and there’s no login wall, which I appreciated.

    One thing that really made a difference were the more serious bits. The odds-to-probability thing that shows how much the bookie’s taking, plus a kelly criterion calculator — I use half kelly since full stakes are far too aggressive. The dutch tool gets used a fair bit when I’m covering two or three runners.

    Not all sunshine though. Its interface looks pretty plain — zero polish, which honestly I don’t mind but some will. On my phone it’s fine though the acca grid are a squeeze. There’s no app, just the site — slight shame just flagging it.

    Right, that’s me. Doesn’t cost anything, not plastered in adverts, does the job. Anyone who honestly does the maths on paper, give it a go — saved me a fair few dumb bets I’d have regretted.

  3. Found a couple of useful angles in here I had not considered before reading carefully, and a quick stop at quorly added more, this is one of those sites where the value compounds the more you read rather than peaking at one viral post and then offering nothing else of substance afterwards which is common.

  4. Really like the way the post resists reaching for cliches that would have made it feel generic, and a quick visit to pgmbconsultancy kept that fresh feel going, original phrasing and unexpected metaphors are signs that the writer is actually thinking rather than just stitching together familiar phrases into the appearance of content.

  5. Reading this gave me a small jolt of recognition for an experience I thought was just mine, and a stop at velon produced more such jolts, content that universalises private experiences without flattening them is doing genuinely useful work and this site is providing that recognition function for me reliably across topics I read.

  6. Useful read, especially because the writer did not assume too much background from the reader, and a quick look at brixelbondgroup continued in the same way, a thoughtful site that meets people where they are which is something the modern web could use a lot more of for both casual and serious readers.

  7. Bookmark earned and the bookmark feels like a permanent addition rather than a maybe, and a look at ieeb confirmed that permanent status, the difference between durable bookmarks and ephemeral ones is something I have learned to feel quickly and this site triggered the durable feeling almost immediately during my first read here.

  8. Now appreciating that the post did not require external context to follow, and a look at zaviroplex maintained the same self contained quality, content that respects new visitors by being readable without prerequisites is content with broader accessibility and this site has clearly invested in keeping each piece reader friendly for fresh arrivals.

  9. Well crafted post, the structure flows naturally from one point to the next without forcing transitions, and a stop at vixaroline kept the same flow going, you can tell when a writer has thought about how their content reads rather than just what it contains and this is one of those examples.

  10. Skipped the comments section but might come back to read it, and a stop at strategicgrowthpartnerships hinted at a quality reader community, sites where the comments are worth reading separately from the post are increasingly rare and signal a particular kind of audience that has grown around the editorial vision over time gradually.

Deixe um comentário

O seu endereço de e-mail não será publicado. Campos obrigatórios são marcados com *